LIBERTY! Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I was a little off on my last post regarding STATE
> FARM INS -claims office;
> the actual verbage is "possession of a firearm on
> these premises is prohibited".While the wording is
> not exact,it is enough for me.I do not feel the
> need to press the point with them.I can choose not
> to do business with them though
> and any other anti-gun corp.
> I feel that this next election will bring on
> bigger anti-gun issues when
> obama-clinton sacks the white house.
>
>
> LIBERTY!

Of course everyone to his choice. But I think I see Grants point. Many of the signs may be for illegal gun toters only and are worded for exactly that. Not to keep people who are legally licensed by the state from carring into a building or premises. Of course if this is truely the case, we would hope that all law enforcement would be in on the details as well.